In concert with the RF transmissions, the receiver may be monitored to identify received signals that correlates to the scheduled RF transmissions. The received RF power level and/or a difference between the transmitted and received RF power levels, e.g., in a form of a transfer function, may be characterized by the sub-band selection measurement 220. In many instances, the sub-band selection measurement 220 will demonstrate some variation in self-interference power level across the frequency band. Variations may be monotonic, or more likely, include relative maxima and/or minima across the frequency band as illustrated by the example self-interference curve 221.
Those regions of the example self-interference curve 221 demonstrating relatively low self-interference power levels indicate regions in which a lesser portion of the transmitter power couples into a front end of the receiver. Accordingly, such regions represent opportunities for tuning a transmitter, such that a relatively lower portion of the transmitted RF signal couples into the receiver. This takes advantage of a natural isolation as may be provided by one or more of the transceiver architecture, a local environment and/or other operational parameters. In the illustrative example, a minimum value occurs at a frequency fx. A local transmitter may be tuned at or near fx, such that when powered, it presents a transmitted spectrum 222 that occurs in a region of low coupling. Beneficially, a spacing of the transmitter at or near fx results in a relatively low self-interference power level. It is envisioned that in at least some instances, there may be more than one regions demonstrating relatively low self-interference power that may serve as alternative locations for tuning the transmitter, and/or for accommodating multiple transmitters operating within the same band.